sigid at JINLab wrote:
> Rich Megginson wrote:
>> sigid at JINLab wrote:
>>> Rich Megginson wrote:
>>>> sigid at JINLab wrote:
>>>>> Rich Megginson wrote:
>>>>>> sigid at JINLab wrote:
>>>>>>> Luke Bigum wrote:
>>>>>>>> Sigid, I think Rich means the admin server access log, which is
>>>>>>>> different to the directory server access log. See
>>>>>>>> /var/log/dirsrv/admin-serv/access. Tail that, then try connect
>>>>>>>> with Firefox and the admin console. Are you seeing any
>>>>>>>> connections?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> my admin access log was empty and tail was show nothing when i
>>>>>>> access using firefox or console. But my admin error log shows
>>>>>> eek - this is very bad. What platform is this? What version of
>>>>>> Fedora DS?
>>>>>
>>>>> i'm using fedora 8 kernel 2.6.24.7-92 with fedora ds as follows:
>>>>> - fedora-ds-base 1.1.1-1
>>>>> - fedora-ds 1.1.1-2
>>>>> - fedora-ds-admin 1.1.4-1
>>>>> - fedora-ds-admin-console 1.1.1-3
>>>>> - fedora-ds-console 1.1.1-3
>>>> Thanks. 32-bit or 64-bit Fedora 8? Are the above packages 32-bit
>>>> or 64-bit e.g.
>>>> rpm -qa --qf '%{name}-%{version}.%{arch}\n' | grep fedora-ds
>>>
>>> I'm using 32 bit Fedora 8.
>>>
>>> -bash-3.2$ rpm -qa --qf '%{name}-%{version}.%{arch}\n' | grep fedora-ds
>>> fedora-ds-admin-console-1.1.1.noarch
>>> fedora-ds-base-1.1.1.i386
>>> fedora-ds-1.1.1.i386
>>> fedora-ds-admin-1.1.4.i386
>>> fedora-ds-console-1.1.1.noarch
>> What about httpd? rpm -qi httpd
>>
>> Any messages in /var/log/messages? /var/log/secure? Is SELinux
>> enabled?
>
> thanks for your support but i have deadline for this server runs for
> production. Fortunatelly currently i can use the fedora 9. Refering to
> my previous post that fedora 9 was having kernel error on my machine
> so it force me to rollback to fedora 8.
>
> On my previous fedora 9 instalation i'm using minimal X by not using
> KDE or Gnome. But after i add gnome for my desktop manager, my server
> runs well, Alhamdulillah....thanks god...
>
> So right now i'm running fedora 9 instead of fedora 8 on my 3rd
> server. My FDS and the java console runs well too. Currently i'm
> preparing to upgrade my 1st server PDC (fedora core 5) to reinstalled
> with fedora 9. And therefore during reinstalation it need PDC
> replacement (3rd server) for production server.
So, Fedora 9 works but not Fedora 8? What could be the difference?
I saw a message last night on IRC - someone attempted to get PHP working
in the Admin Server - was that you? If so, that's probably it. The
Admin Server was not designed to be a general purpose web/app server -
it is a special "instance" of Apache that is designed only to run the
Admin Server and Console apps, and nothing else. Other modules such as
php, python, etc. are not supported and will probably cause bad behavior
up to and including crashing the Admin Server.
>
> --
> Fedora-directory-users mailing list
> Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3245 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20080617/efb919b0/attachment.bin
