sigid at JINLab wrote:
> Rich Megginson wrote:
>> sigid at JINLab wrote:
>>> Luke Bigum wrote:
>>>> Sigid, I think Rich means the admin server access log, which is
>>>> different to the directory server access log. See
>>>> /var/log/dirsrv/admin-serv/access. Tail that, then try connect with
>>>> Firefox and the admin console. Are you seeing any connections?
>>>
>>> my admin access log was empty and tail was show nothing when i
>>> access using firefox or console. But my admin error log shows
>> eek - this is very bad. What platform is this? What version of
>> Fedora DS?
>
> i'm using fedora 8 kernel 2.6.24.7-92 with fedora ds as follows:
> - fedora-ds-base 1.1.1-1
> - fedora-ds 1.1.1-2
> - fedora-ds-admin 1.1.4-1
> - fedora-ds-admin-console 1.1.1-3
> - fedora-ds-console 1.1.1-3
Thanks. 32-bit or 64-bit Fedora 8? Are the above packages 32-bit or
64-bit e.g.
rpm -qa --qf '%{name}-%{version}.%{arch}\n' | grep fedora-ds
>
> --
> Fedora-directory-users mailing list
> Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3258 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20080613/55e2d002/attachment.bin
