glibc errors

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Bjorn Oglefjorn wrote:
> I am trying to track down the cause of some errors that have been 
> occurring on a number of our servers using LDAP. We have noticed that 
> when a certain LDAP group exceeds 65 users we begin seeing glibc 
> errors for users in the group. Users that are not in the group do not 
> exhibit this behavior.
>
> We have seen this issue on machines running Centos 4.5 x86 & x86_64 
> with glibc-2.3.4-2.36 and RH4 x86_64 running glibc-2.3.4-2.25. We are 
> running Fedora Directory Server 1.0.4 on Centos 4.5. We have added a 
> 3rd FDS slave and turned up debugging but have not seen anything that 
> appears to be relevant in the logs on the 3rd slave.
>
> This problem is not a 65 user limit as we have other groups with well 
> over 65 members that do not display this behavior. We also created a 
> new group with identical users and it did not display this problem.
This sounds like a problem with pam_ldap or nss_ldap.  You might want to 
report this on a CentOS list.  If you are a Red Hat customer, you can 
report it through your usual support channel.  I don't think this is a 
directory server problem.
>
> 1) With 66 users in the massweb group
>
> [root at megalon ~]# getent group massweb
> *** glibc detected *** free(): invalid next size (normal): 0x09a225b0 ***
> Aborted
>
>
> 2) After removing any user from the massweb group to reduce the total 
> members to 65
>
> [root at megalon ~]# getent group massweb
> massweb:x:3016:afaxon,ashairza,ccrump,jhorowit,mmarum,morendai,usmall,adroffne,afaxon,amurphre,aoliver,ayellipe,bdonohue,bdunn,beckert,blarsen,bwphilli,catanis,ccrump,chaynes,clyons,cwong,dbarber,dmuse,dnicol,edougher,egallant,ekubosia,evizcain,feeddrop,gtulonen,halokush,hbraverm,jbartus,jbrown,jhobbs,jking,jlederma,jpecora,jthayer,kbalbedi,kbeam,kginn,mbuonfig,mcrawfor,mlarsen,mlong,mwalsh,osedano,proche,prondeau,pweinber,rhorriga,rkersey,rskutins,sasaro,sbrodeur,sculver,smoriart,support,swestenh,tbaltimo,torgelfi,usmall,vvalenti 
>
>
> Has anyone encountered a similar problem? Any suggestions would be 
> most welcome.
>
> Best regards
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> --
> Fedora-directory-users mailing list
> Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
>   

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3245 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20070927/d996bba3/attachment.bin 


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora User Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora QA]     [Fedora Triage]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Apps]     [Maemo Users]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Maemo Users]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux