Dael Maselli wrote: > Well, I think I found a workaround, instead of deleting the changelog > I tried > to change the max records in it, then after sending 2 or 3 update from > a "good" > server the errors disappears and all updates work well. > > Is it possible that there is some information in the DS configuration > that doesn't > clear after changelog recreation but flush correctly after entries > expire? Yes, something like that. See the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=388021 And please update the bug with your workaround instructions. > > Now all 4 nodes works, but I hope there will be a bug-fix soon. > > Thank you very much. > > Dael. > > > Rich Megginson wrote: >> Dael Maselli wrote: >>> Dear Richard, >>> >>> The problem came back, this time in one node. >> I've created a bug to track this issue - >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=388021 >> >> A less drastic solution than recreating everything from scratch will >> be to export the database from a good master, and reimport it into >> that master, then reinit all other masters from that master. You >> will probably want to make sure there are no pending updates in any >> of your masters first, or you will lose them. >> >> I'm working on a better fix for this, but in the meantime, you should >> not have to reinstall everything. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > -- > Fedora-directory-users mailing list > Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 3245 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20071119/fe6ed7ce/attachment.bin