I can't understand very well what fds do during replica. My node A has replica id 1 and node B has 2, in the changelog of A I see records like 4725e604000000010000 or 4725e80f000000010000 and in B records like 472224f2000000020000, so I conclude that 5th digit from right is the replica id. Am I wrong??? When I get the logs "Can't locate CSN 47222163000000020000" in A, is A looking in its own changelog? or in B one? Because, if is true what i said before, A is looking fot id 1 and B for id 2... Right? By the way, i'm using bin/slapd/server/dbscan -f to look in the changelog, when fds gives the error "Can't locate CSN", I can't see the csn id in the changelog of A nor B. Thank you. Dael Maselli wrote: >> Do you have a changelog configured on B? Is B configured as a multiple >> master? Is the replica ID for B different than A? > > Yes to all. > > I hope it's an error of mine, we are planning a big reorganization of > our Authentication and Authorization Infrastructure, FDS seems to be > great for our needs. > > I think it is a misconfiguration and maybe it work if I reinstall FDS, > but i need to understand what's happening. > > Thank you. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > -- > Fedora-directory-users mailing list > Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users -- ___________________________________________________________________ Dael Maselli --- INFN-LNF Computing Service -- +39.06.9403.2214 ___________________________________________________________________ Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch ___________________________________________________________________ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 3000 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20071029/4bc1f6a5/attachment.bin
