>Any thoughts on what logs from FDS would be slurp-able, or if FDS >supports writing that kind of replication log? > > Originally the two came from the same code. Netscape Directory Server 1.x used a replication mechanism that was derived from slurpd (but the slurp functionality was included in the main server). That code used the older slurp-compatible logging. The present day FDS has multi-master replication that is entirely different and uses quite different logging. However, for backwards compatibility reasons (with older Netscape 4.x servers and before), the old log format was preserved as a configurable option. Hence the thought that possibly slurpd is still compabible with that legacy changelog format. However, my personal recommendation would be that you get FDS to build and run on SLES. My belief is that will be easier/quicker/cheaper to do than to figure out if slurpd/FDS will work together. There are just so many things that can go wrong, and proving that it works properly is a non-trivial project.
