John Griffin-Wiesner wrote: > On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 08:39:59AM -0700, Richard Megginson wrote: > >> John Griffin-Wiesner wrote: >> > > >>> I haven't given slurpd a try yet. Does anyone know if it is >>> compatible with FDS? >>> >>> >> It just might work. slurpd is a push model (not the pull model of >> syncrepl in newer openldap's), and if it just uses plain old ldap >> add/mod/del operations to push the changes, then it just might work. >> >>> Thanks in advance. >>> > > Any thoughts on what logs from FDS would be slurp-able, or if FDS > supports writing that kind of replication log? > I don't know. FDS has an audit log (off by default) that might be usable by slurpd. > > >> -- >> Fedora-directory-users mailing list >> Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users >> > > > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 3178 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20061101/8ce4c989/attachment.bin
