Vsevolod (Simon) Ilyushchenko wrote: > Hi, > > I've noticed that FDS is significantly slower in answering queries > than openldap. If I run 'ls -l /home' on the list of 64 home > directories whose owners are all different, I get the list back in 1 > second if I use openldap. Version 7 of FDS took 16 seconds, and FDS > 1.0.2 takes 12 seconds. > > The docs mention increasing cache sides to improve performance, but my > cache is set to 10 M, which seems to be large enough, and the timing > does not improve if I run 'ls -l' repeatedly. Is there anything else I > can tune? It sounds like the search is against an unindexed attribute. I'd take a look at the search in your access log and check if it says "NOTES=U". If so, that means that it is an unindexed search. You would need to create the proper indexes for the search to improve the performance. -NGK > > Thanks, > Simon -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 3241 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20060410/fe86119b/attachment.bin
