It sounds like you might have some unindexed searches. You should be able to confirm by examining the FDS log files after doing your ls runs. Vsevolod (Simon) Ilyushchenko wrote: > Hi, > > I've noticed that FDS is significantly slower in answering queries > than openldap. If I run 'ls -l /home' on the list of 64 home > directories whose owners are all different, I get the list back in 1 > second if I use openldap. Version 7 of FDS took 16 seconds, and FDS > 1.0.2 takes 12 seconds. > > The docs mention increasing cache sides to improve performance, but my > cache is set to 10 M, which seems to be large enough, and the timing > does not improve if I run 'ls -l' repeatedly. Is there anything else I > can tune? > > Thanks, > Simon
