Bingo! Down to 2 seconds! I had to add indexes on uidNumber and gidNumber. Thanks, Simon Nathan Kinder wrote on 04/10/2006 04:07 PM: > Vsevolod (Simon) Ilyushchenko wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I've noticed that FDS is significantly slower in answering queries >> than openldap. If I run 'ls -l /home' on the list of 64 home >> directories whose owners are all different, I get the list back in 1 >> second if I use openldap. Version 7 of FDS took 16 seconds, and FDS >> 1.0.2 takes 12 seconds. >> >> The docs mention increasing cache sides to improve performance, but my >> cache is set to 10 M, which seems to be large enough, and the timing >> does not improve if I run 'ls -l' repeatedly. Is there anything else I >> can tune? > > > It sounds like the search is against an unindexed attribute. I'd take a > look at the search in your access log and check if it says "NOTES=U". > If so, that means that it is an unindexed search. You would need to > create the proper indexes for the search to improve the performance. > > -NGK > >> >> Thanks, >> Simon > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > -- > Fedora-directory-users mailing list > Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users -- Simon (Vsevolod ILyushchenko) simonf at cshl.edu http://www.simonf.com "Think like a man of action, act like a man of thought." Henri Bergson
