Advantages of using FDS vs OpenLDAP?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 7/8/05, Kevin Myer <kevin_myer at iu13.org> wrote:
> Quoting Sam Tran <stlist at gmail.com>:
> > I was wondering how FDS compares with OpenLDAP in terms of performance.
> 
> Well, its faster, in our case (and I say that tongue-in-cheek).  Our current
> primary directory server is running on a dual 168Mhz Ultra 2 Sun box.  And our
> secondary is a Sparcstation 10, at a whopping 70Mhz :)
> 
> > If you don't mind me asking how big is your current LDAP
> > infrastructure in terms of entries and number of connections/sec.? How
> > well your test FDS performs compare to your current LDAP server?
> 
> Its a small installation, maybe 10,000 entries, but that services our own
> organization, as well as 22 school districts, each in separate trees.  But per
> above, there's really no way I can provide an accurate comparison between the
> current and anything else, other than to say its faster.
> 
> > I would appreciate your input.
> 
> Factors that go into my decision (and I use Fedora loosely, to describe my
> experience and observations with Netscape/Sun/iPlanet products generally):
> 
> Cost (its a wash between OpenLDAP vs. Fedora DS)
> Manageability (hands down Fedora, simply because I'm familar with the Netscape
> management infrastructure)
> Scalability (my guess is Fedora, based on the size of installations
> that are out
> there)
> Availability (Fedora - no proven multimaster support in OpenLDAP)
> Ease of migration (Fedora - an upgrade to OpenLDAP meant refactoring
> all ACL's,
> massaging attributes and objectclasses, etc.)
> 
> Kevin
> 
> --
> Kevin M. Myer
> Senior Systems Administrator
> Lancaster-Lebanon Intermediate Unit 13  http://www.iu13.org
> 
> 
> --
> Fedora-directory-users mailing list
> Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
> 

Thanks Rich and Kevin for your input.

As far as I am concerned the management console and the multimaster
replication would be the two main advantages of FDS.

However according to that paper multi-master replication could lead to
inconsistencies:
http://www.watersprings.org/pub/id/draft-zeilenga-ldup-harmful-02.txt

What do you think?

Thanks.
Sam




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora User Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora QA]     [Fedora Triage]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Apps]     [Maemo Users]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Maemo Users]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux