If I can piggyback off of this question and ask another: advantages of using RedHat Directory Server vs. Fedora Directory Server? The only thing I can see we get with RedHat Directory server is official support (and at the prices I was quoted per year, for two servers, I could hire half a person, although academic pricing wasn't available at the time :) The situation I'm in is one where I have an aging directory infrastructure, going all the way back to the days when the Directory Server was branded with the Netscape brand :) Its been on my TODO list to upgrade to something, for the past two years, but I never got around to migrating to OpenLDAP, for a number of reasons. With the release of RedHat/Fedora Directory Server, it was a matter of installing it, adding a few schema modifications, exporting data from the old server, and importing into the new. Simple as pie. I've been running with that in a test environment for a month, no problems. And I'm ready to plan out a full scale conversion and setup multimaster replication. So am I missing anything obvious, beside official support, for what I would pay for Red Hat Directory Server? Kevin -- Kevin M. Myer Senior Systems Administrator Lancaster-Lebanon Intermediate Unit 13 http://www.iu13.org
