Advantages of using FDS vs OpenLDAP?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Kevin Myer wrote:

> If I can piggyback off of this question and ask another: advantages of 
> using
> RedHat Directory Server vs. Fedora Directory Server?
>
> The only thing I can see we get with RedHat Directory server is 
> official support
> (and at the prices I was quoted per year, for two servers, I could 
> hire half a
> person, although academic pricing wasn't available at the time :)

Sure.  I was told by the Marketing director that there would be academic 
pricing for RHDS.  For what it's worth, Red Hat marketing has decided to 
target the whales first - large enterprises and govt. organizations with 
deep pockets that would find our pricing much more attractive than our 
competitors in that space.

>
> The situation I'm in is one where I have an aging directory 
> infrastructure,
> going all the way back to the days when the Directory Server was 
> branded with
> the Netscape brand :)  Its been on my TODO list to upgrade to 
> something, for
> the past two years, but I never got around to migrating to OpenLDAP, 
> for a
> number of reasons.  With the release of RedHat/Fedora Directory 
> Server, it was
> a matter of installing it, adding a few schema modifications, 
> exporting data
> from the old server, and importing into the new.  Simple as pie.  I've 
> been
> running with that in a test environment for a month, no problems.  And 
> I'm
> ready to plan out a full scale conversion and setup multimaster 
> replication.
>
> So am I missing anything obvious, beside official support, for what I 
> would pay
> for Red Hat Directory Server?

Official support, upgrades, patches.  Easily installable/upgradeable 
binaries rather than build from source code.  If there is a patch for 
FDS, it is unlikely that the patch will be made readily available as a 
binary (although we will try).

>
> Kevin
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3312 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20050708/2ef1a1b9/attachment.bin 


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora User Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora QA]     [Fedora Triage]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Apps]     [Maemo Users]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Maemo Users]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux