George Holbert wrote: > As I understand it, replicated schema is stored in the 99user.ldif > file on each consumer. > Does anyone know if schema defined in 60x.ldif through 98x.ldif files > on the master is replicated to consumers? It is not. > Or will masters only replicate the schema that is present in their > local 99user.ldif file? Only schema added over LDAP will be automatically replicated. > > In other words, will schema changes made to "60custom.ldif" on the > master be replicated to each consumer's 99user.ldif file, or will each > consumer's /<serverroot>/config/schema directory need to get an > updated copy of 60custom.ldif ? No. Because there is no way to update the schema in the fie 60custom.ldif via LDAP. > > - George > > > Jeff Clowser wrote: > >> >> >> Brian K. Jones wrote: >> >>> On Monday 20 June 2005 2:03 pm, Mike Jackson wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> Don't put schema into 99user.ldif, it's not maintainable. >>>> >>> >>> >>> This would seem to be contrary to the documentation on redhat's >>> site. I'm certainly not meaning to say you're wrong - quite the >>> contrary - I'm pointing out to whomever it may concern that the docs >>> need polishing :) >>> >> Keep in mind that you can edit schema using the console if the schema >> you are editing is in 99user.ldif. If you put it in any other file, >> the console will see it as read-only. >> >> As a "good" practice, I'd say if you are testing or have schema that >> changes often (for whatever reason), use 99user.ldif, but once you >> have a stable schema, put it in a separate file for maintainability. >> If you are rolling out multiple apps with custom schema in each, it >> would probably be userful to put separate apps customizations in >> separate files (i.e. 98mail.ldif, 98cal.ldif, etc). Just makes it >> easier to keep things straight. >> >> - Jeff >> >> >> >> -- >> Fedora-directory-users mailing list >> Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users >> > > > > -- > Fedora-directory-users mailing list > Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 3312 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20050620/6aa56831/attachment.bin
