On Monday 20 June 2005 2:03 pm, Mike Jackson wrote: > Don't put schema into 99user.ldif, it's not maintainable. This would seem to be contrary to the documentation on redhat's site. I'm certainly not meaning to say you're wrong - quite the contrary - I'm pointing out to whomever it may concern that the docs need polishing :) > > Instead, create a file like 90myOwnSchema.ldif, then you can version > control and upgrade it when needed. I've also seen the docs mention that these files are imported in order, so I understand, and will change this. Presumably, I can do a simple "mv" on the file. Lemme know if this is not the case. > > Also, you should read about the silent installation capability of the I did. Thanks! > setup program. I have done extensive coding to generate silent.inf files Seen 'em, thanks! > from arbitrary data sources, and have automated the entire installatoin > and replicaton configuration process from start to finish. Right - and I plan to use this in the future to make disaster recovery, moving of services/machines as simple and brainless as humanly possible. The first step, though, was to get the import right before I go automating it ;-) Did any of your coding allow for a "userSchema" keyword in the config file, for which I could've just put the path to my schema file? That would be nice, but I don't remember seeing it. I did see that I could specify an ldif file, but attempts to put schema extensions in that ldif file have, so far, failed. thanks, brian. > > -- > mike > > -- > Fedora-directory-users mailing list > Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
