On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 04:50:26AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 09:43:35AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > > Regardless, if the rwsem code can be made to check for exclusive or > > shared locking, we can get rid of the mrlock abstraction. Can we do > > that first, Christoph, then make this lock change? > > I was going to do that next, but if you want the patch order switched > around I can do that as well. Yeah, I'd prefer we remove te abstraction first, then switch to the vfs inode lock. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
