On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 10:26:49AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> Christoph, it look slike there's an ENOSPC+ENOMEM behavioural regression here.
> generic/224 on my 1p/1GB RAM VM using a 1k lock size filesystem has
> significantly different behaviour once ENOSPC is hit withi this patchset.
>
> It ends up with an endless stream of errors like this:
I've spent some time trying to reproduce this. I'm actually getting
the OOM killer almost reproducible for for-next without the iomap
patches as well when just using 1GB of mem. 1400 MB is the minimum
I can reproducibly finish the test with either code base.
But with the 1400 MB setup I see a few interesting things. Even
with the baseline, no-iomap case I see a few errors in the log:
[ 70.407465] Filesystem "vdc": reserve blocks depleted! Consider increasing
reserve pool
size.
[ 70.195645] XFS (vdc): page discard on page ffff88005682a988, inode 0xd3, offset 761856.
[ 70.408079] Buffer I/O error on dev vdc, logical block 1048513, lost async
page write
[ 70.408598] Buffer I/O error on dev vdc, logical block 1048514, lost async
page write
27s
With iomap I also see the spew of page discard errors your see, but while
I see a lot of them, the rest still finishes after a reasonable time,
just a few seconds more than the pre-iomap baseline. I also see the
reserve block depleted message in this case.
Digging into the reserve block depleted message - it seems we have
too many parallel iomap_allocate transactions going on. I suspect
this might be because the writeback code will not finish a writeback
context if we have multiple blocks inside a page, which can
happen easily for this 1k ENOSPC setup. I've not had time to fully
check if this is what really happens, but I did a quick hack (see below)
to only allocate 1k at a time in iomap_begin, and with that generic/224
finishes without the warning spew. Of course this isn't a real fix,
and I need to fully understand what's going on in writeback due to
different allocation / dirtying patterns from the iomap change.
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
index 620fc91..d9afba2 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
@@ -1018,7 +1018,7 @@ xfs_file_iomap_begin(
* Note that the values needs to be less than 32-bits wide until
* the lower level functions are updated.
*/
- length = min_t(loff_t, length, 1024 * PAGE_SIZE);
+ length = min_t(loff_t, length, 1024);
if (xfs_get_extsz_hint(ip)) {
/*
* xfs_iomap_write_direct() expects the shared lock. It
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
