On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 03:28:39PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > generic/224 on my 1p/1GB RAM VM using a 1k lock size filesystem has > > significantly different behaviour once ENOSPC is hit withi this patchset. > > Works fine on my 1k test setup with 4 CPUs and 2GB RAM. 1 CPU and 1GB > RAM runs into the OOM killer, although I haven't checked if that was > the case with the old code as well. I'll look into this more later > today or tomorrow. It was doing fine before my changes - I'm going to investigate what caused the change in behavior. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
