Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 11:24 AM, Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Moreover, we're going to do the full badblocks lookup anyway when we >>> call ->direct_access(). If we had that information earlier we can >>> avoid this fallback dance. >> >> None of the proposed approaches looks clean to me. I'll go along with >> whatever you guys think is best. I am in favor of wrapping up all that >> duplicated code, though. > > Christoph originally pushed for open coding this fallback decision > per-filesystem. I agree with you on the "none the above" options are > clean. I don't recall him saying "open code". Rather, the sentiment was to leave the fallback to the callers. That doesn't mean you can't wrap it up in a convenience function. Cheers, Jeff _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
