Re: about the xfs performance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,Emmanuel
Thank you for your reply , I have two types of pcie-ssd cards: Intel P3600  and ES3000 V2 PCIe SSD ;
I did this testing as you mentioned above , but the results are also bad. 

2016-04-12 0:10 GMT+08:00 Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
Le Mon, 11 Apr 2016 22:14:06 +0800
Songbo Wang <hack.coo@xxxxxxxxx> écrivait:

>      mkfs: mkfs.xfs /dev/hioa2 -f -n size=64k -i size=512 -d
> agcount=40 -l size=1024m.
>      mount: mount /dev/hioa2 /mnt/  -t xfs -o
> rw,noexec,nodev,noatime,nodiratime,nobarrier,discard,inode64,logbsize=256k,delaylog
> I use the following command to test iops: fio -ioengine=libaio -bs=4k
> -direct=1 -thread -rw=randwrite -size=50G -filename=/mnt/test
> -name="EBS 4KB randwrite test" -iodepth=64 -runtime=60
> The results is normal at the beginning which is about 210k±,but some
> seconds later, the results down to 19k±.

You should first try default mkfs settings, with default mount options.
Normally mkfs.xfs should initiate a TRIM on the SSD, therefore
performance should remain predictable.

What model of SSD card are you using? With an HGST NVMe SN1x0 I've got
very consistent results (no degradation with time).

--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Emmanuel Florac     |   Direction technique
                    |   Intellique
                    |   <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
                    |   +33 1 78 94 84 02
------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

[Index of Archives]     [Linux XFS Devel]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux