Re: about the xfs performance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 4/11/16 11:10 AM, Emmanuel Florac wrote:
> Le Mon, 11 Apr 2016 22:14:06 +0800
> Songbo Wang <hack.coo@xxxxxxxxx> écrivait:
> 
>>      mkfs: mkfs.xfs /dev/hioa2 -f -n size=64k -i size=512 -d
>> agcount=40 -l size=1024m.
>>      mount: mount /dev/hioa2 /mnt/  -t xfs -o
>> rw,noexec,nodev,noatime,nodiratime,nobarrier,discard,inode64,logbsize=256k,delaylog
>> I use the following command to test iops: fio -ioengine=libaio -bs=4k
>> -direct=1 -thread -rw=randwrite -size=50G -filename=/mnt/test
>> -name="EBS 4KB randwrite test" -iodepth=64 -runtime=60
>> The results is normal at the beginning which is about 210k±,but some
>> seconds later, the results down to 19k±.
> 
> You should first try default mkfs settings, with default mount options.

Agreed.  Where did that set of options come from, in any case?

-Eric

> Normally mkfs.xfs should initiate a TRIM on the SSD, therefore
> performance should remain predictable.
> 
> What model of SSD card are you using? With an HGST NVMe SN1x0 I've got
> very consistent results (no degradation with time).
> 

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs




[Index of Archives]     [Linux XFS Devel]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux