On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 02:43:24PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 2:39 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven > <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Below is the list of build error/warning regressions/improvements in > > v4.6-rc1[1] compared to v4.5[2]. > > > > Summarized: > > - build errors: +9/-6 > > > [1] http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/head/10114/ (all 262 configs) > > [2] http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/head/10047/ (all 262 configs) > > > 9 error regressions: > > + /home/kisskb/slave/src/fs/xfs/xfs_ondisk.h: error: call to > > '__compiletime_assert_79' declared with attribute error: XFS: > > sizeof(xfs_attr_shortform_t) is wrong, expected 8: => 79:2 > > cris-allyesconfig, cris-allmodconfig Yup, cris is the only platform that throws this error on this structure. It's an on-disk structure and relying on the gcc optimiser to do the same thing from release to release has become such a crap-shoot these days. Hence as a stop-gap measure we added build time checking of what they compiler is doing with those structures, and to refuse to build XFS if the compiler/platform is doing something obviously different. Modernising the on-disk structure definitions is on the list of things to do, but it's nowhere near the top of my list at the moment... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
