So I looked into this, and it seems we really don't care about the size - xfs_attr_leaf_entsize_remote pad it to the next multiple of 4 anyway. So I think we really should simply remove the size check here. Assuming all architectures pad up a structure that isn't word aligned the same way just isn't a sensible assumption. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
