On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 02:56:48PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > > I think using a small fixed size array as a variable sized array > > is not a good idea, especially with increasinly "smart" optimizing > > compilers. I'd rather take this structure out the size checking, > > and then move it to a C99 VLA instead of the size 1 hack in the long > > run. > > I don't have the time right now to do this, so I'm just going to > drop it - I'd guess the overlap between m68k and XFS users is so > close to zero that it just doesn't matter. I'll just drop this > patch for now. I'll send you a patch for it. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
