On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 09:00:01PM +0100, Felix Janda wrote: > These are equivalent on glibc, while musl does not know loff_t. > > In the long run, it would be preferable to enable transparent LFS so > that off64_t could be replaced by off_t. > > Signed-off-by: Felix Janda <felix.janda@xxxxxxxxx> Looks fine, Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
