These are equivalent on glibc, while musl does not know loff_t. In the long run, it would be preferable to enable transparent LFS so that off64_t could be replaced by off_t. Signed-off-by: Felix Janda <felix.janda@xxxxxxxxx> --- include/linux.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/include/linux.h b/include/linux.h index 827dbe1..4872a1e 100644 --- a/include/linux.h +++ b/include/linux.h @@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ platform_discard_blocks(int fd, uint64_t start, uint64_t len) #define EFSCORRUPTED EUCLEAN /* Filesystem is corrupted */ #define EFSBADCRC EBADMSG /* Bad CRC detected */ -typedef loff_t xfs_off_t; +typedef off64_t xfs_off_t; typedef uint64_t xfs_ino_t; typedef uint32_t xfs_dev_t; typedef int64_t xfs_daddr_t; -- 2.4.10 _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
