On 12/21/15 1:37 PM, Vallo Kallaste wrote: > On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 12:48:31PM -0600, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > [...] >>> I'd like to know the current state of ext4 auto_da_alloc-like workarounds in XFS, >>> particularly for RHEL7. Considering the two cases in >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ext4#Delayed_allocation_and_potential_data_loss >>> is XFS behaving the same as ext4, both mounted with default options? >> >> The sync-on-close-after-file-got-truncated case has been handled since 2007; see >> >> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/dgc/linux-xfs.git/commit/?id=ba87ea699ebd9dd577bf055ebc4a98200e337542 >> >> The sync-after-rename behavior was suggested and rejected for xfs, see >> >> http://marc.info/?t=139845506300002&r=1&w=2 >> >> If you'd like to add this information to the XFS wiki, please do so! > > Thanks, this is an exemplary answer, not to mention lightning fast as well! > > I would consider if Wiki had at http://xfs.org/index.php/Special:RequestAccount page: > * Privacy policy http://xfs.org/index.php/XFS.org:Privacy_policy > * Terms of Service http://xfs.org/index.php?title=XFS.org:Terms_of_Service&action=edit&redlink=1 > > The latter being something I must read and agree on before I can request a user > account. Hohum... Russell, can you either remove the requirement for reading a nonexistent page, or add that page? Thanks, -Eric > BR, > _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
