On Thu, Nov 05, 2015 at 04:48:27PM -0700, Ross Zwisler wrote: > On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 02:27:12PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > > Hi folks, > > > > This is an updated patch set that was first posted here: > > > > http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2015-10/msg00006.html > > > > I've dropped the DAX locking revert patch from it; that's on it's > > way to Linus via other channels and is essentially independent to > > this set of XFS changes. > > > > The only real change in the XFS code between the two versions is the > > addition of XFS_TRANS_RESERVE in the DAX path in > > xfs_iomap_write_direct() to allow it to dip into the reserve block > > pool for unwritten extent conversion rather than reporting ENOSPC. > > > > Patches are against 4.3-rc5 + XFS for-next branch. > > > > -Dave. > > Hey Dave, > > I was going to start testing these, but I'm having trouble finding a baseline > where they apply cleanly. It looks like xfs/for-next already contains v1 of > the series, and they don't seem to apply cleanly to the current > xfs/xfs-misc-fixes-for-4.4-2 nor to v4.3. The xfs repo I'm looking at is > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dgc/linux-xfs.git The xfs-dax-updates branch of that kernel contains the v3 version of the patches I posted a few days ago. i.e. just pull the for-next branch of the XFS tree, because that already contains all the patches integrated into the rest of the XFS for-next tree... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
