On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 02:27:12PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > Hi folks, > > This is an updated patch set that was first posted here: > > http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2015-10/msg00006.html > > I've dropped the DAX locking revert patch from it; that's on it's > way to Linus via other channels and is essentially independent to > this set of XFS changes. > > The only real change in the XFS code between the two versions is the > addition of XFS_TRANS_RESERVE in the DAX path in > xfs_iomap_write_direct() to allow it to dip into the reserve block > pool for unwritten extent conversion rather than reporting ENOSPC. > > Patches are against 4.3-rc5 + XFS for-next branch. > > -Dave. Hey Dave, I was going to start testing these, but I'm having trouble finding a baseline where they apply cleanly. It looks like xfs/for-next already contains v1 of the series, and they don't seem to apply cleanly to the current xfs/xfs-misc-fixes-for-4.4-2 nor to v4.3. The xfs repo I'm looking at is git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dgc/linux-xfs.git What am I missing? Thanks, - Ross _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
