Thanks for the review Brian, I'll walk over it and fix the points you mentioned. > > > I still don't really get why we have separate -l and -s options here. It > seems to me that the behavior of -l already gives us the information > that -s does. Even if that's not obvious enough, the -l command could > just print out both. For example: > > "Largest inode: 1234 (32-bit)" I agree with you here, but, I'll let Dave answer this question, maybe he had some another idea for it that I'm not aware of. Cheers. -- Carlos _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
