On Friday 23 of October 2015, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 11:27:52AM +0200, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz wrote: > > Hi. > > > > I got such situation, fresh boot, 4.1.10 kernel, init scripts start > > mounting filesystems. One fs wasn't very lucky: > > > > [ 15.979538] XFS (md3): Mounting V4 Filesystem > > [ 16.256316] XFS (md3): Ending clean mount > > [ 28.343346] XFS (md4): Mounting V4 Filesystem > > [ 28.629918] XFS (md4): Ending clean mount > > [ 28.662125] XFS (md5): Mounting V4 Filesystem > > [ 28.980142] XFS (md5): Ending clean mount > > [ 29.049421] XFS (md6): Mounting V4 Filesystem > > [ 29.447725] XFS (md6): Starting recovery (logdev: internal) > > [ 4517.327332] XFS (md6): Ending recovery (logdev: internal) > > > > It took over 1h to mount md6 filesystem. > > > > Questions: > > - is it possible to log how much data is needed to be recovered > > from log? > > Yes. > > > Some data that would give a hint on how big this is (and thus > > rough estimate on how long it will take). Not sure if that's known > > at time when this message is being printed. > > It's not known, then, and can't be known until recovery has sparsed > the log and read all the objects from disk it needs to recover. So I assume not available early enough to be usable. > > - now such long mount time is almost insane, so I wonder why could > > be the reason. Is the process multithreaded, single threaded? cpus > > were idle > > What kernel? "> > I got such situation, fresh boot, 4.1.10 kernel" > We now have readahead which minimises the IO latency of > pulling objects into the kernel for recovery, but if you are > recovering a couple of million individual inode changes (e.g. from a > 'chproj -R /path/with/millions/of/files') then it take a long tiem > to read in all the inodes and write them all back out. It was like 10x rsnapshots there (so tons of files copied/hardlinked, then rsynced etc). > A single > inode in the log lik ethis only consumes about 200 bytes of log > space, so there can easily be 5000 inodes to recover per megabyte > of log space you have. And if you have a 2GB log, then that could > contain 10 million inode core changes that need to be recovered.... Ok, so what I'm looking for is any kind of indication (in dmesg probably) that it will take long time (thus was asking about log recovery size). Because right now it's hard to estimate how long downtime will be and ability to estimate such things is important. > And if you have a slow SATA RAID, the small random writes for inode > writeback might only retire a hundred inodes a second and log > recovery will block until all those inodes are completely written > back (i.e. same problem that can lead to unmount taking hours when > there are hundreds of thousands of dirty inode in memory). That's a nightmare (fortunately rarely hapening here). Thanks for explanations. > Cheers, > Dave. -- Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz, arekm / ( maven.pl | pld-linux.org ) _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
