On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 09:33:33AM +0200, Jan Tulak wrote: > On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 2:22 AM, Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 08:26:23PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 01:09:40AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > > On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 07:45:57AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > > > > > Hmmm, looks like I accidentally comitted an earlier version of this > > > > > patch yesterday. Jan, can you send delta patches to what I committed > > > > > to address more recent review comments? Sorry, my bad. > > > > > > > > Can you revert it for now? I think most of these changes are incorrect > > > > and should either be dropped for now by disabling fsx or will need > > > > a major rework. > > > > > > I'll just rebase the for-next branch, I guess, and remove it > > > completely from the history. I've got another lockdep fix that needs > > > to be pushed before it all hits tomorrow's linux-next build, anyway. > > > > Getting my trees mixed up. I'll revert the patch on the next push. > > > And as I noticed, ' > xfsprogs: Add includes required for OS X builds > ' was also > selected in an older version. Other patches looks OK, though. :-) > Should I send delta patch for that one? It is just about three #includes. Yes. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
