On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 2:22 AM, Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 08:26:23PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 01:09:40AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 07:45:57AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > > Hmmm, looks like I accidentally comitted an earlier version of this
> > > patch yesterday. Jan, can you send delta patches to what I committed
> > > to address more recent review comments? Sorry, my bad.
> >
> > Can you revert it for now? I think most of these changes are incorrect
> > and should either be dropped for now by disabling fsx or will need
> > a major rework.
>
> I'll just rebase the for-next branch, I guess, and remove it
> completely from the history. I've got another lockdep fix that needs
> to be pushed before it all hits tomorrow's linux-next build, anyway.
Getting my trees mixed up. I'll revert the patch on the next push.
And as I noticed, '
xfsprogs: Add includes required for OS X builds' was also
selected in an older version. Other patches looks OK, though. :-)
Should I send delta patch for that one? It is just about three #includes.
Cheers,
Jan
_______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
