On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 11:53:09AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > Ok, I've gone back and had a look at this now and reminded myself of > the discussion we had and the problems found. The end results are > remarkably similar - maybe that's why I found it easy to write this > patch set. i.e. your patchset was buried somewhere in my brain, even > though I'd forgotten about it at the surface... > > How would you like to see this patchset broken up into more > sensible/reviewable chunks? It's just folding and splitting patches, > so it's not a big deal to rework it... I think it should be less. Patch 3 should go first, and then 1,2,4 & 5 as a single one. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
