On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 06:30:21AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > > I'd expect to move it close to stuct xfs_mount, and maybe even merge > > it into that in the long run. > > I guess moving the structure there is fine, but we still want all > the version functions to be shared with userspace, which then makes > for an interesting set of dependencies. Any other ideas? Are they really worth the sharing? If they are worth it we'll need somethign that can expect a xfs_sb/xfs_mount to be defined. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
