> /*
> - * Superblock - in core version. Must match the ondisk version below.
> - * Must be padded to 64 bit alignment.
> - */
> -typedef struct xfs_sb {
> - __uint32_t sb_magicnum; /* magic number == XFS_SB_MAGIC */
> - __uint32_t sb_blocksize; /* logical block size, bytes */
> -static inline int xfs_sb_version_hasfinobt(xfs_sb_t *sbp)
> +static inline int xfs_sb_version_hasfinobt(struct xfs_sb *sbp)
So xfs_format.h now requires struct xfs_sb to be defined before it
can be included? I guess we need to move these macros around as well.
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_super.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_super.h
> index 2b830c2..a02236b 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_super.h
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_super.h
> @@ -61,6 +61,87 @@ struct xfs_mount;
> struct xfs_buftarg;
> struct block_device;
>
> +/*
> + * Superblock - in core version. This does not have ot match the size and shape
> + * of the on-disk superblock, but must contain all the fields that we use in the
> + * on-disk superblock.
> + */
> +struct xfs_sb {
Is this really the right header? xfs_super.h only really is for bits
related to linux super block operastions.
I'd expect to move it close to stuct xfs_mount, and maybe even merge
it into that in the long run.
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
