On 11/13/14 11:47, Eric Sandeen wrote:
On 11/13/14 11:35 AM, Mark Tinguely wrote:
On 11/12/14 12:57, Eric Sandeen wrote:
"dirty" seems to be a remnant of unfinished code; other bits of
it are there but commented out, so comment out "if (dirty);" as
well, which is a no-op if statement which can't be true.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen<sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
inventory/inv_stobj.c | 2 ++
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/inventory/inv_stobj.c b/inventory/inv_stobj.c
index becac17..84b15d9 100644
--- a/inventory/inv_stobj.c
+++ b/inventory/inv_stobj.c
@@ -976,7 +976,9 @@ stobj_delete_mobj(int fd,
}
free ( mfiles );
+/*
if ( dirty );
+*/
}
free ( strms );
Why not remove all the references to dirty in the function?
Like you said, it doesn't do anything.
Somebody left this and the rest of the commented-out code there
for some documentation reason, it seems, so I figured...
It's not like the rest of the code is a thing
of beauty, and this wart is ruining its perfection. ;)
I have no idea, honestly. xfsdump is dropped in from some alien
world. Somebody @ SGI might know, or could find out by looking
at long-lost history?
-Eric
I will see what I can dig up.
We need to start pulling off the warts.
The interactive command line parsing is also damaged, I will find the
patch and post it.
--Mark.
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
