On 4/28/14 11:35 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Similar to xfs_file_fsync(), I think xfs_dir_fsync() needs
> to test for a shut down fs, lest we go down paths we'll
> never be able to complete; Boris reported that during some
> stress tests he had threads stuck in xlog_cil_force_lsn
> via xfs_dir_fsync().
(re-ping)
So Dave, you fixed this with:
So, you did solve the problem properly I guess, in
commit ac983517ec5941da0c58cacdbad10a231dc4e001
Author: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed May 7 08:05:50 2014 +1000
xfs: don't sleep in xlog_cil_force_lsn on shutdown
But should my patch still go in, if only to be consistent
with file_fsync() paths?
-Eric
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
