On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 02:32:19PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Sat, Aug 09, 2014 at 05:55:19PM +0200, Fanael Linithien wrote: > > 2014-08-09 2:54 GMT+02:00 Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > > What fixes are you talking about? List of commits, please, noting > > > whether the commit already has a "cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>" in > > > it or not. > > > > These are the commits: > > > > 400b9d88757c0bfbdfa97014e090ec40a31c1282 > > 67dc288c21064b31a98a53dc64f6b9714b819fd6 (this is the only one with the cc) > > 5fd364fee81a7888af806e42ed8a91c845894f2d > > ad3714b82c631a34724da09a7daa53afcab952fa > > Ok, but please use the "one-line format" when quoting commits. > > I.e. this: > > $ git log --oneline -n 4 ad3714b > ad3714b xfs: dquot recovery needs verifiers > 5fd364f xfs: quotacheck leaves dquot buffers without verifiers > 67dc288 xfs: ensure verifiers are attached to recovered buffers > 400b9d8 xfs: catch buffers written without verifiers attached Actually, I'm not going to send this last patch back to older, stable kernels. I really don't want to have to port random patches back to older kernels to avoid it generating false positives. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
