On Sat, Aug 09, 2014 at 05:55:19PM +0200, Fanael Linithien wrote: > 2014-08-09 2:54 GMT+02:00 Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > What fixes are you talking about? List of commits, please, noting > > whether the commit already has a "cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>" in > > it or not. > > These are the commits: > > 400b9d88757c0bfbdfa97014e090ec40a31c1282 > 67dc288c21064b31a98a53dc64f6b9714b819fd6 (this is the only one with the cc) > 5fd364fee81a7888af806e42ed8a91c845894f2d > ad3714b82c631a34724da09a7daa53afcab952fa Ok, but please use the "one-line format" when quoting commits. I.e. this: $ git log --oneline -n 4 ad3714b ad3714b xfs: dquot recovery needs verifiers 5fd364f xfs: quotacheck leaves dquot buffers without verifiers 67dc288 xfs: ensure verifiers are attached to recovered buffers 400b9d8 xfs: catch buffers written without verifiers attached is much more informative to the reader without a git tree to look up commits. As it is, those commits have not yet been sent to Linus, hence they won't yet be accepted by the stable kernel folk. And because they haven't been sent to Linus yet, I can redo the commits in that topic branch with the needed stable tags. I've got to add a couple more fixes that need to go to stable, too, so a pull req won't happen for a couple of days yet.... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
