On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 11:18:11PM +0200, Grozdan wrote: > I don't want to start another thread as this is my last question but > it's one unrelated to the original question from Frank You should always start a new thread when you have an unrelated question. At minimum, you should change the subject line... > One of my partitions was almost full (there was 5 GB over according to > df -h). I had about 8 torrents open in the client, all sizes between 4 > and 6 GB (they were all downloaded and got never "released" from the > client as I was seeding back). When I tried to add a torrent to > download which was 3 GB, the client reported that there was no more > space left over on the partition. I suspect this is related to > speculative preallocation and because the 8 torrents were all "open" > they still had extra space allocated by the speculative preallocation > and thus I couldn't add the 3GB torrent even though df says there was > 5GB over but in reality it was much less. Am I correct on this or is > there something completely else that happened? No idea - not enough information. Please start a new thread, including the information here: http://xfs.org/index.php/XFS_FAQ#Q:_What_information_should_I_include_when_reporting_a_problem.3F as well as the 'xfs_bmap -vp' output for the torrents in question. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
