On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 09:19:35AM +0200, Iustin Pop wrote: > Hi, > > While testing a just-made dump with via 'xfsrestore -t', I learned that > the default housekeepingdir path is still under the original filesystem. > My xfsrestore therefore failed, since that filesystem was read-only. > > Since '-t' should denote a pure no-op operation, with no changes, would > it make more sense to default the housekeeping location to a temporary > location if it is used? It seems to me like -t shouldn't recreate the files in the housekeeping directory at all. I did take a brief look at the code and is a huge mess that seems to recreate files unconditionally, so I don't really have a good solution for this yet. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
