----- Original Message -----
> ----- Original Message -----
> > There aren't a lot of changes since v3.1.3, but with the rate of change of
> > xfsdump (slow), I wonder if it's worth cutting a point release to get these
> > bugfixes out there:
>
> I've verified and pushed a few Debian packaging updates folks have sent
> through to the git tree below. Please include these odds & ends too...
>
And some similar changes for xfsprogs... thanks.
Changes committed to git://oss.sgi.com/nathans/xfsprogs.git master
debian/Makefile | 2 +-
debian/changelog | 7 +++++++
debian/watch | 3 +++
3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
commit b6ad8545923aaa0bcc6ec7f7d3edea00382ef3a1
Author: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed Jul 16 13:50:47 2014 +1000
xfsprogs: update debian packaging for next release
Make a note of each of the Debian bugs resolved in this release,
so that they'll be automatically closed during next upload.
Signed-off-by: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
commit 1a05f9188b1a151fa6dcdec61880699d2acf53cd
Author: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed Jul 16 13:49:16 2014 +1000
xfsprogs: add a watch file into the debian packaging
Apparently it can improve some Debian tools that check it (e.g. UDD).
Resolves Debian bug #748483.
Signed-off-by: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
