Hi,
----- Original Message -----
> There aren't a lot of changes since v3.1.3, but with the rate of change of
> xfsdump (slow), I wonder if it's worth cutting a point release to get these
> bugfixes out there:
I've verified and pushed a few Debian packaging updates folks have sent
through to the git tree below. Please include these odds & ends too...
thanks!
Changes committed to git://oss.sgi.com/nathans/xfsdump.git master
debian/Makefile | 2 +-
debian/changelog | 8 ++++++++
debian/control | 2 +-
debian/rules | 3 +++
debian/watch | 3 +++
5 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
commit 96be05e971e1e23c252f5432fe430cd724a52910
Author: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed Jul 16 13:29:12 2014 +1000
xfsdump: update debian packaging for next release
Make a note of each of the Debian bugs resolved in this release,
so that they'll be automatically closed during next upload.
Signed-off-by: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
commit f33aa73b89624feaeb94f4d48b88f2d480798420
Author: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed Jul 16 13:25:36 2014 +1000
xfsdump: add a watch file into the debian packaging
Apparently it can improve some Debian tools that check it (e.g. UDD).
Resolves Debian bug #748482.
Signed-off-by: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
commit fae9bcf317ce3a0d919ebdc6fd667993a4dbd484
Author: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed Jul 16 13:21:27 2014 +1000
xfsdump: rebuild configure files during deb package builds
Use the same technique applied to xfsprogs recently to tackle
out-of-date config.{sub,guess} files in the build.
Resolves Debian bug #746531.
Signed-off-by: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
