Hi, During the restore of a file system, a few directories failed to have their extent size set: xfsrestore: WARNING: attempt to set extended attributes (xflags 0x1080, extsize = 0x800000, projid = 0x0) of a failed: Invalid argument Since there were just a few, I've set the nodump flag (0x80 in flags above) manually, which worked, but trying to set the extent size still fails: xfs_io . xfs_io> extsize [0] . xfs_io> extsize 8m xfs_io: XFS_IOC_FSSETXATTR .: Invalid argument The xfsctl man page says that an extent size should be settable any time on a directory, so why would this fail? Looking at the kernel sources, I see a number of possible cases where EINVAL is returned: - ip->i_d.di_nextents non-zero - requested extend size bigger than MAXEXTLEN; not the case here - extsize_fsb > mp->m_sb.sb_agblocks / 2; not the case - fa->fsx_extsize % size - extent size not a multiple of FS block size; again not the case So to me this reads as if the di_nextents check can also fail for a directory which has extents, contradicting the man page. Which one needs to be updated? The question arises to if the extent size also applies, then, to allocating extents for a directory - instead of just being inherited for files (the man page says no). thanks, iustin _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs