On Fri, 2014-05-16 at 10:55 +0200, Lukáš Czerner wrote: > On Fri, 16 May 2014, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 10:48:42AM +0200, Luk?? Czerner wrote: > > > > > As requested I've created a new mailing list for xfstests > > > > > development and discussion. Reflecting the fact that the test > > > > > harness is not really XFS specific anymore, the list is: > > > > > > > > > > fstests@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > > > > > Isn't there an "x" missing somewhere? > > > > > > It's intentional and it is "Reflecting the fact that the test > > > harness is not really XFS specific anymore", even though the test > > > suite itself keep the name xfstests. > > > > > > This way it's more obvious to people that this is in fact not xfs > > > specific. > > > > Having the name different from the project it is for is stupid. Either > > rename the test suite, or use the same name for the mailing list. > > Renaming the test suite is a good option if we can agree on this. Instead of renaming the test suite, why not just "backronym" it to mean something different? The letter x is used to mean "cross" in many contexts, so "xfstests" could easily mean "cross-filesystem tests" - a name that fits perfectly! Only kind of joking, Calvin. -- Calvin Walton <calvin.walton@xxxxxxxxxx> _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
