On Sun, May 04, 2014 at 12:16:23PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Sat, May 03, 2014 at 11:04:05AM -0500, Mark Tinguely wrote: > > Depends on how parent inode pointers are implemented, this folding the > > internal version of get and set attributes could be undone. > > We might have to introduce _locked version at that point. But I'd like > to keep the xfs_name removal and other assorted cleanups. *nod* If we need to factor the code for new additions, then we should do that appropriately for the new code when it arrives. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
