On Sat, May 03, 2014 at 09:36:05AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > Whoops, missed reply-all. > > Yes, it will fail this way w/o the kernel patch. > > User quota gets removed OK because flags accidentally line up; > group quota remains, so you'd see exactly this. Ok. Dave, can you pick it up for for-next? > > -Eric > > On 5/3/14, 6:48 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > Can I assumes that xfs/007 failing with: > > > > --- tests/xfs/007.out 2014-05-03 08:58:08.000000000 +0000 > > +++ /root/xfstests/results//xfs/007.out.bad 2014-05-03 > > 11:48:05.000000000 +0000 > > @@ -7,4 +7,4 @@ > > *** umount > > *** Usage after quotarm *** > > core.nblocks = 0 > > -core.nblocks = 0 > > +core.nblocks = 1 > > > > is because this patch didn't get picked up yet? > > > > _______________________________________________ > > xfs mailing list > > xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx > > http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs > > > > _______________________________________________ > xfs mailing list > xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx > http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs ---end quoted text--- _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
