Re: [PATCH] xfs: fix Q_XQUOTARM ioctl

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Whoops, missed reply-all.

Yes, it will fail this way w/o the kernel patch.

User quota gets removed OK because flags accidentally line up;
group quota remains, so you'd see exactly this.

-Eric

On 5/3/14, 6:48 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Can I assumes that xfs/007 failing with:
> 
> --- tests/xfs/007.out	2014-05-03 08:58:08.000000000 +0000
> +++ /root/xfstests/results//xfs/007.out.bad	2014-05-03
> 11:48:05.000000000 +0000
> @@ -7,4 +7,4 @@
>  *** umount
>  *** Usage after quotarm ***
>  core.nblocks = 0
> -core.nblocks = 0
> +core.nblocks = 1
> 
> is because this patch didn't get picked up yet?
> 
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
> 

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs




[Index of Archives]     [Linux XFS Devel]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux