2014-04-08 9:54 GMT+09:00, Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 11:53:31PM +0900, Namjae Jeon wrote: >> From: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> FALLOC_FL_INSERT_RANGE was mentioned as the opposite command of collapse >> range from discussion between Hugh Dickins and Dave Chinner. >> >> In continuation of the work of making the process of non linear editing >> of >> media files faster, we introduce here the new flag FALLOC_FL_INSERT_RANGE >> for fallocate. >> >> This flag will work opposite to the newly added FALLOC_FL_COLLAPSE_RANGE >> flag. >> As such, specifying FALLOC_FL_INSERT_RANGE flag will insert zeroed-out >> space >> in between the file within the range specified by offset and len. User >> can >> write new data in this space. e.g. ads. >> Like collapse range, currently we have the limitation that offset and len >> should be block size aligned for both XFS and Ext4. >> >> The semantics of the flag are : >> 1) It allocates new zeroed out on disk space of len bytes starting >> at offset byte without overwriting any existing data. All the data >> blocks >> from offset to EOF are shifted towards right to make space for >> inserting >> new blocks >> 2) It should be used exclusively. No other fallocate flag in combination. >> 3) Offset and length supplied to fallocate should be fs block size >> aligned >> in case of xfs and ext4. >> 4) Insert range does not work for the case when offset is >> overlapping/beyond >> i_size. If the user wants to allocate space at the end of file they >> are >> advised to use either ftruncate(2) or fallocate(2) with mode 0. >> 5) It increses the size of file by len bytes. >> >> Namjae Jeon (3): >> fs: Add FALLOC_FL_INSERT_RANGE flags for fallocate >> xfs: Add support FALLOC_FL_INSERT_RANGE for fallocate >> ext4: Add support FALLOC_FL_INSERT_RANGE for fallocate >> TODO : xfsprog: xfsio: Add support FALLOC_FL_INSERT_RANGE for fallocate >> TODO : xfstests: Add insert range testcase > > Namjae, what's your proposed timeframe on getting the xfs_io and tes > cases sorted out? I'm just trying to plan ahead for the next couple > of months (i.e. the 3.16 merge cycle), so some indication of whether > I can expect this to be complete and ready for merge within that > timeframe would be helpful to me. Hi. Dave. I will post the next version's patch-set with xfs_io and xfstests next week. Yes, I think that it can be complete before opening 3.6 merge window. And sorry for late response and work... Currently I can not do it full time. But will do the best for the aim that insert range would be merged in 3.6. > > FWIW, it would be really nice if you could add support for fsx and > fsstress for this as well as adding corner case tests. :) I can, I will include these jobs on next version. :) Thanks! > > Cheers, > > Dave. > -- > Dave Chinner > david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
